
Nearly two years after Hamas’ brutal Oct. 7th attacks and the ongoing war in Gaza, the hostage issue has remained one of Israel’s deepest national wounds. Every operation and negotiation has carried the unbearable question of how far Israel should go to bring its people home.
The October 2025 hostage deal between Israel and Hamas is one of the most morally complex events of this war. It’s a decision that forces us to weigh human life against national security and compassion against caution.
When I first heard about the possible agreement back in September, I was hopeful. After nearly two long years of waiting, there was finally a path for Israeli families to be reunited with the loved ones stolen from them. But that hope was followed by a sense of unease. What measures would it take to bring the final 20 living hostages home? I couldn’t help but think of the young soldiers — some barely out of high school — who die within every operation in Gaza. I imagined their mothers asking, “Why should my child’s life be risked to rescue another?”
This deal, however, took a different route. Instead of another military operation, Israel agreed to withdraw troops and release nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for the 20 remaining hostages and the bodies of seven more. On Oct. 13th, they came home.
At first, an overwhelming sense of joy and relief came over me. I saw the videos of mothers finally hugging their sons and children running into their father’s arms after two years of separation, starvation, and fear. I saw the skin and bones of the remaining, starved hostages and cried out of guilt, wondering how I could ever be skeptical of such a deal. However, the details began to sink in, and the reality grew heavier.
Among the released prisoners were Palestinians convicted of deadly attacks: bombers, militants, and leaders of terror groups such as Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and Fatah. These are not symbolic releases; they are people directly tied to the murder of civilians. While key figures like Marwan Barghouti were excluded, the sheer number of dangerous operatives now walking free raises urgent questions.
Here is a list of some of the released prisoners:
Imad Qawasmeh, 52 (Hamas) – killed 16 Israelis in 2004 Beersheva bus bombing
Qassem Aref Khalil al-Asafreh, 36 (Hamas) – stabbed a Jewish student in 2019
Muhammad Aref Samhan, 55 (Fatah/Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades) – killed 23 people in the 2003 Jerusalem bus bombing
Ibrahim Muhammad al-Raai, 46 (Fatah/Tanzim) – responsible for the 2006 Nablus bombing and multiple shooting attacks
Raad Abd al-Aziz, 45 (Fatah) – convicted of murder, attempted murder, and weapons offenses
Omar Mahmoud Bassis, 60 (Palestinian Islamic Jihad) – responsible for explosive attacks during the Second Intifada
Firas Sadiq Muhammad Ghanem, 51 (Fatah/Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades) – responsible for attacks causing 9 Israeli deaths
Iyad Muhammad Abu al-Rub, 51 (Palestinian Islamic Jihad) – senior PIJ commander in Jenin; responsible for suicide bombings; deported
Source: https://www.ajc.org/news/who-are-the-palestinian-prisoners-freed-in-the-israel-hamas-deal
For Israelis like me, the deal feels like both a victory and a risk while the release of prisoners and terrorists feels like a long-overdue justice for the Palestinians. Yet, both sides know the same truth: that peace built on desperate times can only last for so long. Israel’s decision reveals an excruciating paradox. To save innocent lives, it had to free those who once took them. To bring its people home, it now risks the safety of others. And so we ask: how can a country built on the value of life justify releasing those who target it? How do we ensure these prisoners don’t return to violence?
Yet as I watched the footage of the fragile but free hostages sinking into their families’ arms, I couldn’t help but feel gratitude. A couple days ago I had the honor of meeting former Israeli hostage Omer Shemtov, 23, who was held in captivity for over 500 days. I asked him a simple question: “What’s it like to be back?” He smiled and said, “Getting your life back — it’s amazing. It’s the best feeling ever. Seeing my parents again and hugging my mom.” As I listened to the rest of his story, the unimaginable psychological and physical torture he endured for nearly two years, I felt a deep, consuming frustration. The kind that makes you angry at yourself, and at anyone, for ever doubting the importance of doing whatever it takes to bring the hostages home.
Much of Shemtov’s story has stayed ingrained in my memory. He described being moved into a cage-like room in the tunnels during part of his captivity. It was a space so small he couldn’t straighten his elbows and so low he could only sit. He said he had never experienced such complete darkness. At one point, after nearly two months underground in the dark, he thought he had gone blind because no matter how hard he tried, he couldn’t even see his own hand held up to his face. He didn’t know when it was night, when it was day, or if he would ever even get out. I thought to myself: while this 23-year-old endured two months of isolation in utter darkness, surviving on just a quarter of a pita each day and sinking into a deep depression, we are debating whether bringing him home was even “worth it.”
The hostages’ survival is a testament to Israel’s unrelenting commitment to every one of its citizens. It promised that no matter the cost, no one would be forgotten. The moral toll of this deal will weigh heavily on the nation for years, but the sight of those reunions reminded me that even amid impossible choices, the sanctity of human life must come first.
Israel’s choice this October was not about politics — it was about human life. And while the price of compassion may one day come, the win of parents holding their children again reminds us what makes that price worth paying.

